People with intellectual disabilities (ID) are significantly less likely to participate in population-based cancer screening than the general population, according to researchers from Radboudumc and academic collaborative Intellectual Disability and Health - Sterker op eigen benen in The Lancet Public Health.
People with ID often have a higher risk of health issues compared to others. Screening is therefore important. However, diseases are often detected later in this group, leading to higher mortality rate. Population screening is designed for early detection of cervical, breast and colon cancer. Researchers from Radboudumc's Department of Primary and Community Care and academic collaborative Intellectual Disability and Health – Sterker op eigen benen have now investigated the participation rate of individuals with ID in these population screening programs. The results, published in The Lancet Public Health, show that people with ID are much less likely to participate in these three population screenings than people without ID. Unfavorable outcomes were found at roughly the same rate in both groups. However, people with ID experienced more frequent difficulties during the screening or follow-up examinations.
Lower participation
Using data from nearly 200,000 people with ID, the researchers looked at who was invited to one or more population screenings between 2015 and 2021, how many of them participated and with what results. Then those outcomes were compared with people without ID. The results showed that people with ID were significantly less likely to participate in screenings for cervical cancer (45% vs. 68%), breast cancer (56% vs. 76%), and colon cancer (52% vs. 73%) compared to people without ID.
More frequent ambiguity
Furthermore, the researchers found that the results were more often inconclusive in people with ID, or that the procedure could not be performed properly. When follow-up testing was needed, people with ID were less likely to participate. This may lead to delays in further diagnosis and treatment or indicate that insufficient thought was given beforehand to the consequences of a possible unfavorable result.
PhD candidate Amina Banda: “Our results show that population screening is not well adapted to the needs of people with intellectual disabilities. It's not just about participation, but also about the accessibility of the procedure itself and the decision-making about participation.”
Better support needed
Based on these findings, the researchers argue for better alignment with the needs of people with ID. Project leader Dr. Maarten Cuypers: “There is a need for better support in decision-making about participation. There is also a need, where possible, to better adapt the implementation of screening to people with VB. Without additional effort, this group remains vulnerable to a worse prognosis with cancer.”
To support care providers in the ID sector in this, the Dutch Association of Intellectual Disability Physicians (NVAVG) is currently developing a guide on how to deal with population screening in people with ID. This will include the results from this study. Chairman of the working group for this guide, Dr. Esther Bakker-van Gijssel: “These results show the usefulness and necessity of the guide that is now being developed. We hope that this guide will contribute to better participation in population screening in the future.”
Population screening
The RIVM, which coordinates population screening in the Netherlands, endorses the importance of improved accessibility. Project leader Karin Honig of the Center for Population Screening at RIVM says: “The RIVM is committed to making easily understandable information available, also for people with intellectual disabilities, for example through Steffie.nl. In addition, the RIVM is involved in the creation of the NVAVG's guide to support the improvement of accessibility and the decision-making process surrounding participation in population screening.”
*This study is part of a larger project on cancer screening and prevention in people with intellectual disabilities and is funded by the Maarten van der Weijden Foundation.
Sterker op eigen benen is a collaboration between the Department of Primary and Community Care at Radboudumc and six care organizations for people with intellectual disabilities and focuses on achieving health equity for people with intellectual disabilities.
*Published in The Lancet Public Health: Cancer screening participation and outcomes among people with an intellectual disability in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional population-based study - Amina Banda, Maarten Cuypers, Jenneken Naaldenberg, Aura Timen, Geraline Leusink
-
Want to know more about these subjects? Click on the buttons below for more news.
More information
Pieter Lomans
persvoorlichter
Related news items

Call for research proposals for Lowlands Science 2025
18 February 2025Researchers, attention please: Lowlands Science is once again seeking research proposals for 2025. Read on for all the details about the outstanding call.
read more